Eritrea vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Eritrea
0.0064 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Africa
0.0919 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eritrea rank
87th
South Africa rank
85th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Eritrea
  • South Africa
-20-1001020196219932024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0919 % change on previous year against 0.0064 % change on previous year in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0855 % change on previous year.

That makes South Africa's figure about 14.5 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 87th and South Africa ranks 85th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2.42 % change on previous year -1.38 % change on previous year 3.8 % change on previous year Eritrea
2000s 1.31 % change on previous year -2.79 % change on previous year 4.1 % change on previous year Eritrea
2010s 0.4791 % change on previous year -2.32 % change on previous year 2.8 % change on previous year Eritrea
2020s 0.193 % change on previous year 0.9471 % change on previous year 0.7541 % change on previous year South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Eritrea or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0919 % change on previous year against 0.0064 % change on previous year in Eritrea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Eritrea and South Africa?
0.0855 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Eritrea and South Africa rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Eritrea ranks 87th and South Africa ranks 85th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/eritrea/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/eritrea/south-africa/">Eritrea vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.