Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.5249 % change on previous year against 0.4198 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1051 % change on previous year.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Papua New Guinea ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.65 % change on previous year | 12.71 % change on previous year | 14.36 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 5.02 % change on previous year | 163.65 % change on previous year | 158.63 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 11.14 % change on previous year | 9.54 % change on previous year | 1.6 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.4716 % change on previous year | 7.52 % change on previous year | 7.05 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.18 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | 0.2366 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.859 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 0.8289 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.5198 % change on previous year | 0.3854 % change on previous year | 0.1343 % change on previous year | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Congo, at 0.5249 % change on previous year against 0.4198 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1051 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Congo ranks 69th and Papua New Guinea ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.