Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.5856 % change on previous year against 0.5249 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 0.0607 % change on previous year.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th of 194 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.65 % change on previous year | -0.6364 % change on previous year | 1.01 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 5.02 % change on previous year | 1.88 % change on previous year | 3.14 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1980s | 11.14 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year | 9.97 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.4716 % change on previous year | 1.29 % change on previous year | 0.8205 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.18 % change on previous year | 0.5898 % change on previous year | 0.5871 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.859 % change on previous year | 0.8063 % change on previous year | 0.0527 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.5198 % change on previous year | 0.5356 % change on previous year | 0.0158 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.5856 % change on previous year against 0.5249 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0607 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Congo ranks 69th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.