Burundi vs Croatia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Burundi
-13.89 % change on previous year
in 2024
Croatia
-13.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Burundi rank
168th
Croatia rank
166th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Burundi
  • Croatia
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports -13.15 % change on previous year against -13.89 % change on previous year in Burundi, a difference of 0.74 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Croatia ahead.

Burundi ranks 168th and Croatia ranks 166th of 194 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 17.19 % change on previous year 0.4259 % change on previous year 16.76 % change on previous year Burundi
2000s 11.01 % change on previous year 4.79 % change on previous year 6.22 % change on previous year Burundi
2010s 6.81 % change on previous year 6.21 % change on previous year 0.5973 % change on previous year Burundi
2020s 1.89 % change on previous year 0.5456 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Burundi or Croatia?
Croatia, at -13.15 % change on previous year against -13.89 % change on previous year in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Burundi and Croatia?
0.74 % change on previous year, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Croatia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Croatia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Burundi ranks 168th and Croatia ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Croatia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/burundi/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/burundi/croatia/">Burundi vs Croatia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.