What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Belgium and Serbia and Montenegro?

0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Serbia and Montenegro?

5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2005.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Serbia and Montenegro: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Belgium

-10.12 % change on previous year

in 2024

Serbia and Montenegro

-10.12 % change on previous year

in 2005

Belgium rank

156th

Serbia and Montenegro rank

157th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

Belgium
Serbia and Montenegro

How they compare

Belgium currently reports -10.12 % change on previous year against -10.12 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 156th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 157th of 194 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Belgium or Serbia and Montenegro?: Belgium, at -10.12 % change on previous year against -10.12 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Belgium and Serbia and Montenegro?: 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Serbia and Montenegro?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2005.
How do Belgium and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?: Belgium ranks 156th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 157th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Serbia and Montenegro: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/belgium/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/belgium/serbia-and-montenegro/">Belgium vs Serbia and Montenegro: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.