Panama vs Sweden: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Panama
0.024 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0246 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Panama rank
69th
Sweden rank
67th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Panama
  • Sweden
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0246 t per square kilometre against 0.024 t per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Panama ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 67th of 150 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.023 t per square kilometre 0.0205 t per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.0033 t per square kilometre 0.0309 t per square kilometre 0.0276 t per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.0323 t per square kilometre 0.0256 t per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0115 t per square kilometre 0.0311 t per square kilometre 0.0196 t per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.0281 t per square kilometre 0.0113 t per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0244 t per square kilometre 0.0246 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Panama or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0246 t per square kilometre against 0.024 t per square kilometre in Panama as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Panama and Sweden?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Panama and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Panama ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 67th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Sweden: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/panama/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/panama/sweden/">Panama vs Sweden: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.