Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ecuador
0.0919 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.1144 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Ecuador rank
36th
Romania rank
33rd

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.1144 t per square kilometre against 0.0919 t per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0225 t per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 36th and Romania ranks 33rd of 150 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.011 t per square kilometre 0.0808 t per square kilometre 0.0698 t per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0153 t per square kilometre 0.1653 t per square kilometre 0.1499 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.024 t per square kilometre 0.1956 t per square kilometre 0.1716 t per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0356 t per square kilometre 0.1663 t per square kilometre 0.1306 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0465 t per square kilometre 0.1074 t per square kilometre 0.0609 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0566 t per square kilometre 0.106 t per square kilometre 0.0494 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ecuador or Romania?
Romania, at 0.1144 t per square kilometre against 0.0919 t per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ecuador and Romania?
0.0225 t per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ecuador ranks 36th and Romania ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.