Chile vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chile
0.0662 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
0.0628 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
46th
Dominican Republic rank
49th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chile
  • Dominican Republic
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0662 t per square kilometre against 0.0628 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0034 t per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Chile ranks 46th and Dominican Republic ranks 49th of 150 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0093 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 0.0045 t per square kilometre 0.0179 t per square kilometre 0.0133 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 0.0082 t per square kilometre 0.0099 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.0198 t per square kilometre 0.0373 t per square kilometre 0.0175 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.0461 t per square kilometre 0.086 t per square kilometre 0.0398 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.0599 t per square kilometre 0.0762 t per square kilometre 0.0164 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.0659 t per square kilometre 0.0777 t per square kilometre 0.0117 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chile or Dominican Republic?
Chile, at 0.0662 t per square kilometre against 0.0628 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chile and Dominican Republic?
0.0034 t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Dominican Republic rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chile ranks 46th and Dominican Republic ranks 49th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chile/dominican-republic/">Chile vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.