Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0039 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0023 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
120th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0039 t per square kilometre against 0.0023 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0016 t per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.7 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 150 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0065 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0051 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0131 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0057 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0047 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Antigua and Barbuda or Zimbabwe?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0039 t per square kilometre against 0.0023 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
0.0016 t per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.