Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0039 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
0.004 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
117th
Honduras rank
116th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Honduras
0.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 0.004 t per square kilometre against 0.0039 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Honduras ranks 116th of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 6 and Honduras in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0046 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.005 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0065 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0054 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0057 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Honduras
2020s 0.0047 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Antigua and Barbuda or Honduras?
Honduras, at 0.004 t per square kilometre against 0.0039 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Honduras ranks 116th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/honduras/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.