Eswatini vs Northern America: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Eswatini
7.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Northern America
1.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
21st
Northern America rank
20th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Eswatini
  • Northern America
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 7.38 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 5.92 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 5.1 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Northern America ahead.

Eswatini ranks 21st and Northern America ranks 20th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Northern America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 2.24 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year 0.4745 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s 5.39 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 3.1 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 1.72 % change on previous year 0.4171 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year Eswatini
1990s 5.38 % change on previous year 2.9 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s -0.3667 % change on previous year 1.86 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year Northern America
2010s 5.46 % change on previous year 1.78 % change on previous year 3.68 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 2.42 % change on previous year 0.2391 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Eswatini or Northern America?
Eswatini, at 7.38 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Eswatini and Northern America?
5.92 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Northern America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Northern America rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Eswatini ranks 21st and Northern America ranks 20th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Northern America: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/northern-america/">Eswatini vs Northern America: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 12,357 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.