Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Rwanda
222,147 An
in 2024
Zimbabwe
240,805 An
in 2024
Rwanda rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Edible offal of pigs: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 240,805 An against 222,147 An in Rwanda, a difference of 18,658 An.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 225 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 18,957 An 148,833 An 129,876 An Zimbabwe
1970s 27,167 An 195,350 An 168,183 An Zimbabwe
1980s 59,718 An 178,000 An 118,282 An Zimbabwe
1990s 62,300 An 209,800 An 147,500 An Zimbabwe
2000s 123,100 An 194,067 An 70,967 An Zimbabwe
2010s 276,014 An 231,973 An 44,041 An Rwanda
2020s 215,231 An 239,544 An 24,312 An Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 240,805 An against 222,147 An in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
18,658 An, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Rwanda ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 14,613 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.