Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Papua New Guinea
0.0001 An per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
12th
Serbia rank
15th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Serbia
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 15th of 150 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 An per US$ of GDP 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Serbia
2020s 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0001 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
0.0001 An per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Papua New Guinea ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 15th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-unit-of-gdp/papua-new-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-unit-of-gdp/papua-new-guinea/serbia/">Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per unit of GDP
Unit
An per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,340 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.