Uruguay vs Zambia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Uruguay
1.03 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.08 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay rank
115th
Zambia rank
113th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Uruguay
  • Zambia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.08 An per square kilometre against 1.03 An per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.05 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 113th of 150 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.38 An per square kilometre 0.0804 An per square kilometre 1.3 An per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 1.88 An per square kilometre 0.1616 An per square kilometre 1.72 An per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 1.52 An per square kilometre 0.2126 An per square kilometre 1.3 An per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 1.7 An per square kilometre 0.3044 An per square kilometre 1.39 An per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 1.56 An per square kilometre 0.4116 An per square kilometre 1.15 An per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 1.26 An per square kilometre 0.9588 An per square kilometre 0.3001 An per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.9996 An per square kilometre 0.8868 An per square kilometre 0.1128 An per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Uruguay or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.08 An per square kilometre against 1.03 An per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Uruguay and Zambia?
0.05 An per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uruguay and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Uruguay ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 113th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zambia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/uruguay/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/uruguay/zambia/">Uruguay vs Zambia: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.