Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Bahamas
0.7279 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.7483 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.7483 An per square kilometre against 0.7279 An per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0204 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4656 An per square kilometre 0.3847 An per square kilometre 0.0809 An per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.4625 An per square kilometre 0.505 An per square kilometre 0.0424 An per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.3626 An per square kilometre 0.4601 An per square kilometre 0.0975 An per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.3315 An per square kilometre 0.5423 An per square kilometre 0.2109 An per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.6439 An per square kilometre 0.5017 An per square kilometre 0.1422 An per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.6846 An per square kilometre 0.5996 An per square kilometre 0.0849 An per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.7203 An per square kilometre 0.6184 An per square kilometre 0.1019 An per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.7483 An per square kilometre against 0.7279 An per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.0204 An per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bahamas ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,691 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.