Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Puerto Rico
0.0139 An per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0145 An per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
116th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.150.2196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0145 An per person against 0.0139 An per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0006 An per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0932 An per person 0.0331 An per person 0.0601 An per person Puerto Rico
1970s 0.1205 An per person 0.0328 An per person 0.0878 An per person Puerto Rico
1980s 0.1386 An per person 0.021 An per person 0.1176 An per person Puerto Rico
1990s 0.1035 An per person 0.0191 An per person 0.0844 An per person Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0275 An per person 0.0156 An per person 0.0119 An per person Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0158 An per person 0.0163 An per person 0.0005 An per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.014 An per person 0.0149 An per person 0.0008 An per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0145 An per person against 0.0139 An per person in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 An per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Puerto Rico ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,840 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.