Botswana vs Mauritius: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Botswana
0.0062 An per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0.0077 An per person
in 2024
Botswana rank
129th
Mauritius rank
126th

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritius
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0077 An per person against 0.0062 An per person in Botswana, a difference of 0.0015 An per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Botswana ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 126th of 150 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0085 An per person 0.0102 An per person 0.0016 An per person Mauritius
1970s 0.0134 An per person 0.0101 An per person 0.0033 An per person Botswana
1980s 0.0059 An per person 0.0116 An per person 0.0057 An per person Mauritius
1990s 0.0044 An per person 0.0127 An per person 0.0083 An per person Mauritius
2000s 0.0058 An per person 0.009 An per person 0.0032 An per person Mauritius
2010s 0.0033 An per person 0.0083 An per person 0.005 An per person Mauritius
2020s 0.0059 An per person 0.0071 An per person 0.0013 An per person Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Botswana or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0077 An per person against 0.0062 An per person in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Botswana and Mauritius?
0.0015 An per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritius?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Mauritius rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Botswana ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 126th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritius: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/botswana/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/botswana/mauritius/">Botswana vs Mauritius: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,840 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.