Cuba vs Thailand: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Cuba
0.0741 % change on previous year
in 2024
Thailand
0.1141 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
92nd
Thailand rank
91st

Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Cuba
  • Thailand
-100-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.1141 % change on previous year against 0.0741 % change on previous year in Cuba, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.5 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Thailand ahead.

Cuba ranks 92nd and Thailand ranks 91st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.04 % change on previous year 5.5 % change on previous year 3.46 % change on previous year Thailand
1970s 2.62 % change on previous year 5.51 % change on previous year 2.89 % change on previous year Thailand
1980s 5.79 % change on previous year 4.43 % change on previous year 1.36 % change on previous year Cuba
1990s 7.8 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Cuba
2000s 8.43 % change on previous year 2.83 % change on previous year 5.6 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 1.8 % change on previous year 0.5133 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year Cuba
2020s -20.01 % change on previous year 0.2128 % change on previous year 20.23 % change on previous year Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.1141 % change on previous year against 0.0741 % change on previous year in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Thailand?
0.04 % change on previous year, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Thailand rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 92nd and Thailand ranks 91st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Thailand: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/cuba/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-pigs-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/cuba/thailand/">Cuba vs Thailand: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 12,549 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.