Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Rwanda
0.093 t per square kilometre
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
0.1656 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
7th
United Arab Emirates rank
5th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Rwanda
  • United Arab Emirates
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.1656 t per square kilometre against 0.093 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0726 t per square kilometre.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.8 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and United Arab Emirates in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0122 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0088 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0172 t per square kilometre 0.0062 t per square kilometre 0.011 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0269 t per square kilometre 0.009 t per square kilometre 0.0179 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0251 t per square kilometre 0.0363 t per square kilometre 0.0112 t per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2000s 0.0366 t per square kilometre 0.0701 t per square kilometre 0.0335 t per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2010s 0.1483 t per square kilometre 0.1342 t per square kilometre 0.0142 t per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0998 t per square kilometre 0.1667 t per square kilometre 0.0669 t per square kilometre United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Rwanda or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.1656 t per square kilometre against 0.093 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
0.0726 t per square kilometre, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Arab Emirates?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Rwanda ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/united-arab-emirates/">Rwanda vs United Arab Emirates: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.