Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Papua New Guinea
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
146th
Suriname rank
143rd

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Suriname
00000196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.7 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 146 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Papua New Guinea or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
0 t per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/suriname/">Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.