New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

New Caledonia
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
144th
Suriname rank
143rd

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Suriname
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 146 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, New Caledonia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between New Caledonia and Suriname?
0 t per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
New Caledonia ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 143rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/suriname/">New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.