Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritius
0.0026 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
83rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
86th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0026 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 83rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 86th of 146 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0267 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0255 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0222 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0204 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0185 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0153 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0321 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0285 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0215 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre 0.0175 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0089 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mauritius, at 0.0026 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 83rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 86th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.