Malta vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malta
0.0157 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0.0177 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malta
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0177 t per square kilometre against 0.0157 t per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 146 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0567 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0553 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0254 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.022 t per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.0074 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0153 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre 0.0078 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0146 t per square kilometre 0.0116 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malta or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0177 t per square kilometre against 0.0157 t per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malta and Zimbabwe?
0.002 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malta ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/zimbabwe/">Malta vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.