Guinea vs Romania: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Guinea
0.0096 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0094 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Guinea rank
51st
Romania rank
52nd

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Guinea
  • Romania
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0096 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Guinea ranks 51st and Romania ranks 52nd of 146 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0048 t per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0041 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0065 t per square kilometre 0.0082 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guinea or Romania?
Guinea, at 0.0096 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guinea and Romania?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Guinea and Romania rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Guinea ranks 51st and Romania ranks 52nd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Romania: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea/romania/">Guinea vs Romania: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.