Congo vs Malaysia: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Congo
0.0006 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0006 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
118th
Malaysia rank
119th
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Congo
- Malaysia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0006 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.
Congo ranks 118th and Malaysia ranks 119th of 146 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1990s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Malaysia?
- Congo, at 0.0006 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Malaysia?
- 0 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Congo ranks 118th and Malaysia ranks 119th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.