Bahamas vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bahamas
0.0018 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
0.0019 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
92nd
Dominican Republic rank
89th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bahamas
  • Dominican Republic
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.0019 t per square kilometre against 0.0018 t per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 92nd and Dominican Republic ranks 89th of 146 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0044 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bahamas or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 0.0019 t per square kilometre against 0.0018 t per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bahamas and Dominican Republic?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Dominican Republic rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bahamas ranks 92nd and Dominican Republic ranks 89th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/dominican-republic/">Bahamas vs Dominican Republic: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.