Argentina vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Argentina
0.0004 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
125th
Equatorial Guinea rank
127th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Argentina
  • Equatorial Guinea
00000.001196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th of 146 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Argentina or Equatorial Guinea?
Argentina, at 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Argentina and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Argentina ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/equatorial-guinea/">Argentina vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.