Antigua and Barbuda vs Brazil: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0009 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.001 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
109th
Brazil rank
107th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Brazil
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.001 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 107th of 146 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0136 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.013 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0155 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0149 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0244 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0237 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0277 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0268 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0129 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0121 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0067 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0017 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Antigua and Barbuda or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.001 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 107th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Brazil: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/brazil/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Brazil: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.