Czechia vs Suriname: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Czechia
0 t per person
in 2017
Suriname
0 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
128th
Suriname rank
130th
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Czechia
- Suriname
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.
Czechia ranks 128th and Suriname ranks 130th of 146 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Czechia or Suriname?
- Czechia, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Suriname as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Czechia and Suriname?
- 0 t per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Czechia ranks 128th and Suriname ranks 130th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.