Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Serbia
-17.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-17.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia rank
169th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
168th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Serbia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-100-50050100196219932024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -17.15 % change on previous year against -17.26 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0.11 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Serbia ranks 169th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 168th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 1.22 % change on previous year 0.6799 % change on previous year 0.5439 % change on previous year Serbia
2010s 7.02 % change on previous year 0.5409 % change on previous year 6.48 % change on previous year Serbia
2020s -5.96 % change on previous year 11.05 % change on previous year 17.01 % change on previous year Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Serbia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -17.15 % change on previous year against -17.26 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.11 % change on previous year, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Serbia ranks 169th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 168th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/serbia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/serbia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 12,075 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.