Pakistan vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Pakistan
2.77 % change on previous year
in 2024
Puerto Rico
3.26 % change on previous year
in 2024
Pakistan rank
50th
Puerto Rico rank
48th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Pakistan
  • Puerto Rico
-100-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 3.26 % change on previous year against 2.77 % change on previous year in Pakistan, a difference of 0.49 % change on previous year.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 50th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 4.17 % change on previous year 4.04 % change on previous year 0.1273 % change on previous year Pakistan
1970s 8.53 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year Pakistan
1980s 5.49 % change on previous year -0.6116 % change on previous year 6.1 % change on previous year Pakistan
1990s 1.83 % change on previous year -13.93 % change on previous year 15.76 % change on previous year Pakistan
2000s 3.61 % change on previous year 12.36 % change on previous year 8.75 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
2010s 2.83 % change on previous year -5.09 % change on previous year 7.92 % change on previous year Pakistan
2020s 2.71 % change on previous year -3.5 % change on previous year 6.2 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Pakistan or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 3.26 % change on previous year against 2.77 % change on previous year in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Pakistan and Puerto Rico?
0.49 % change on previous year, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Puerto Rico rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Pakistan ranks 50th and Puerto Rico ranks 48th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/puerto-rico-us/">Pakistan vs Puerto Rico: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 12,075 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.