New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

New Zealand
-10.45 % change on previous year
in 2024
Timor-Leste
-9.82 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand rank
156th
Timor-Leste rank
155th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
-100-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports -9.82 % change on previous year against -10.45 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

New Zealand ranks 156th and Timor-Leste ranks 155th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 7.34 % change on previous year -3.21 % change on previous year 10.55 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 15.64 % change on previous year -8.97 % change on previous year 24.6 % change on previous year New Zealand
1980s 28.71 % change on previous year 8.95 % change on previous year 19.76 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s -3.04 % change on previous year 7.96 % change on previous year 11.01 % change on previous year Timor-Leste
2000s -1.86 % change on previous year 0.8809 % change on previous year 2.74 % change on previous year Timor-Leste
2010s 5.2 % change on previous year 2.15 % change on previous year 3.05 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s -8.26 % change on previous year -5.26 % change on previous year 3 % change on previous year Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at -9.82 % change on previous year against -10.45 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
0.63 % change on previous year, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
New Zealand ranks 156th and Timor-Leste ranks 155th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 12,075 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.