Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Mexico
-0.7997 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-1.05 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico rank
115th
Papua New Guinea rank
117th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Mexico
  • Papua New Guinea
-50050196219932024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -0.7997 % change on previous year against -1.05 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.2503 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 115th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 5.02 % change on previous year -8.88 % change on previous year 13.9 % change on previous year Mexico
1970s 9.71 % change on previous year 5.27 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Mexico
1980s 2.44 % change on previous year 3.73 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.286 % change on previous year 5.39 % change on previous year 5.1 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.49 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2010s -0.7683 % change on previous year -1.86 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Mexico
2020s 0.3846 % change on previous year -1.23 % change on previous year 1.61 % change on previous year Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Mexico or Papua New Guinea?
Mexico, at -0.7997 % change on previous year against -1.05 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
0.2503 % change on previous year, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Mexico and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Mexico ranks 115th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/mexico/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/mexico/papua-new-guinea/">Mexico vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 12,075 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.