Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 39.79 % change on previous year against 6.46 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 33.33 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 6.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 183 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.69 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 3.74 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 11.61 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | 9.78 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | 26.29 % change on previous year | 2.31 % change on previous year | 23.98 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.696 % change on previous year | 3.04 % change on previous year | 2.34 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 9.88 % change on previous year | 3.67 % change on previous year | 6.22 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | -0.2461 % change on previous year | 2.87 % change on previous year | 3.12 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 19.24 % change on previous year | 2.72 % change on previous year | 16.52 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 39.79 % change on previous year against 6.46 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 33.33 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.