How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tuvalu?

32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Suriname vs Tuvalu: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Suriname

0.0033 An per square kilometre

in 2023

Tuvalu

0 An per square kilometre

in 1992

Suriname rank

147th

Tuvalu rank

150th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

Suriname
Tuvalu

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0033 An per square kilometre against 0 An per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0033 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 147th and Tuvalu ranks 150th of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Suriname	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0232 An per square kilometre	0 An per square kilometre	0.0232 An per square kilometre	Suriname
1970s	0.014 An per square kilometre	0 An per square kilometre	0.014 An per square kilometre	Suriname
1980s	0.0168 An per square kilometre	0.0333 An per square kilometre	0.0165 An per square kilometre	Tuvalu
1990s	0.0235 An per square kilometre	0 An per square kilometre	0.0235 An per square kilometre	Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Suriname or Tuvalu?: Suriname, at 0.0033 An per square kilometre against 0 An per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Suriname and Tuvalu?: 0.0033 An per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tuvalu?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Suriname and Tuvalu rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?: Suriname ranks 147th and Tuvalu ranks 150th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Tuvalu: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/suriname/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/suriname/tuvalu/">Suriname vs Tuvalu: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit: An per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 155 places, 8,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.