New Caledonia vs Sweden: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

New Caledonia
0.0044 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0023 An per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
145th
Sweden rank
148th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Sweden
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0044 An per square kilometre against 0.0023 An per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0021 An per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.9 times Sweden's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 145th and Sweden ranks 148th of 154 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Sweden Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0111 An per square kilometre 0.0034 An per square kilometre 0.0077 An per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0059 An per square kilometre 0.0022 An per square kilometre 0.0037 An per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Caledonia or Sweden?
New Caledonia, at 0.0044 An per square kilometre against 0.0023 An per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Caledonia and Sweden?
0.0021 An per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Caledonia ranks 145th and Sweden ranks 148th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Sweden: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/new-caledonia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/new-caledonia/sweden/">New Caledonia vs Sweden: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.