Cuba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Cuba
3.56 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.56 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
54th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
55th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Cuba
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 3.56 An per square kilometre against 3.56 An per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Cuba ranks 54th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 55th of 154 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2126 An per square kilometre 9.59 An per square kilometre 9.38 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.2489 An per square kilometre 9.9 An per square kilometre 9.65 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.3147 An per square kilometre 14.19 An per square kilometre 13.87 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.5014 An per square kilometre 16.68 An per square kilometre 16.18 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.97 An per square kilometre 13.03 An per square kilometre 11.06 An per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.45 An per square kilometre 2.37 An per square kilometre 0.0814 An per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 3.61 An per square kilometre 2.71 An per square kilometre 0.9012 An per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Cuba, at 3.56 An per square kilometre against 3.56 An per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 An per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 54th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 55th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Cuba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.