Cuba vs Indonesia: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Cuba
3.56 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
3.57 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
54th
Indonesia rank
53rd

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Cuba
  • Indonesia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 3.57 An per square kilometre against 3.56 An per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.01 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Cuba ranks 54th and Indonesia ranks 53rd of 154 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2126 An per square kilometre 1.13 An per square kilometre 0.914 An per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0.2489 An per square kilometre 1.73 An per square kilometre 1.48 An per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 0.3147 An per square kilometre 2.93 An per square kilometre 2.61 An per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 0.5014 An per square kilometre 3.23 An per square kilometre 2.73 An per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 1.97 An per square kilometre 3.15 An per square kilometre 1.18 An per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 2.45 An per square kilometre 3.65 An per square kilometre 1.2 An per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 3.61 An per square kilometre 3.66 An per square kilometre 0.0514 An per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 3.57 An per square kilometre against 3.56 An per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Indonesia?
0.01 An per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Indonesia rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 54th and Indonesia ranks 53rd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Indonesia: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/indonesia/">Cuba vs Indonesia: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.