Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Costa Rica
0.4234 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
0.3862 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
109th
Madagascar rank
112th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Madagascar
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.4234 An per square kilometre against 0.3862 An per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0372 An per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 109th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 154 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Madagascar in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0084 An per square kilometre 0.3923 An per square kilometre 0.3839 An per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.0082 An per square kilometre 0.6171 An per square kilometre 0.6088 An per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 0.0118 An per square kilometre 0.8169 An per square kilometre 0.8051 An per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 0.2702 An per square kilometre 0.3783 An per square kilometre 0.1082 An per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 0.3965 An per square kilometre 0.3069 An per square kilometre 0.0896 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.4444 An per square kilometre 0.3394 An per square kilometre 0.105 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.4161 An per square kilometre 0.3833 An per square kilometre 0.0328 An per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Costa Rica or Madagascar?
Costa Rica, at 0.4234 An per square kilometre against 0.3862 An per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Costa Rica and Madagascar?
0.0372 An per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Madagascar rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Costa Rica ranks 109th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/costa-rica/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/costa-rica/madagascar/">Costa Rica vs Madagascar: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.