Mauritania vs Sudan: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Mauritania
0.2304 An per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.2517 An per person
in 2024
Mauritania rank
8th
Sudan rank
6th
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Mauritania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.2517 An per person against 0.2304 An per person in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0213 An per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 8th and Sudan ranks 6th of 154 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2907 An per person | 0.32 An per person | 0.0293 An per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.2433 An per person | 0.2636 An per person | 0.0203 An per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Mauritania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.2517 An per person against 0.2304 An per person in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Mauritania and Sudan?
- 0.0213 An per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Mauritania ranks 8th and Sudan ranks 6th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.