Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Poland
18.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
7th
Poland rank
10th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Poland
-100-50050196219932024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 18.35 % change on previous year against 2 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 16.35 % change on previous year.

That makes Poland's figure about 9.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 3.86 % change on previous year -3.83 % change on previous year 7.69 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 2.48 % change on previous year -9.01 % change on previous year 11.49 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 2.78 % change on previous year -15.85 % change on previous year 18.63 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 1.54 % change on previous year -5.53 % change on previous year 7.08 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Poland?
Poland, at 18.35 % change on previous year against 2 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
16.35 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th and Poland ranks 10th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/least-developed-countries-ldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/least-developed-countries-ldcs/poland/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 12,306 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.