China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

China, Macao SAR
5.34 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal
5 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
25th
Nepal rank
27th

Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Nepal
-2000200400600800196219932024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 5.34 % change on previous year against 5 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0.34 % change on previous year.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nepal ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 25th and Nepal ranks 27th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s -9.93 % change on previous year 3.67 % change on previous year 13.6 % change on previous year Nepal
1970s 85.93 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year 83.45 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s -33.59 % change on previous year -0.3058 % change on previous year 33.28 % change on previous year Nepal
1990s 2.61 % change on previous year 2.63 % change on previous year 0.0198 % change on previous year Nepal
2000s 3.36 % change on previous year 3.38 % change on previous year 0.0195 % change on previous year Nepal
2010s 2.9 % change on previous year 3.46 % change on previous year 0.5628 % change on previous year Nepal
2020s 5.39 % change on previous year 4.28 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, China, Macao SAR or Nepal?
China, Macao SAR, at 5.34 % change on previous year against 5 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between China, Macao SAR and Nepal?
0.34 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Nepal?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
China, Macao SAR ranks 25th and Nepal ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/china-macao-sar/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-goat-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/china-macao-sar/nepal/">China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 12,306 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.