Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Singapore
5 t
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
8.03 t
in 2024
Singapore rank
244th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
242nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Singapore
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
050100150200250196119922024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 8.03 t against 5 t in Singapore, a difference of 3.03 t.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.6 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 244th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 242nd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 4 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 146.26 t 25.18 t 121.08 t Singapore
1970s 84.51 t 23.04 t 61.47 t Singapore
1980s 46.17 t 21.41 t 24.76 t Singapore
1990s 23.68 t 20.01 t 3.67 t Singapore
2000s 6.06 t 20.56 t 14.5 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 6.06 t 11.07 t 5.02 t Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 5.03 t 8.35 t 3.32 t Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Singapore or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 8.03 t against 5 t in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
3.03 t, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Singapore ranks 244th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 242nd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.