Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production

Bulgaria
4,027 t
in 2017
Namibia
4,021 t
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
146th
Namibia rank
147th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Namibia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922024

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 4,027 t against 4,021 t in Namibia, a difference of 6 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 146th and Namibia ranks 147th of 250 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 13,743 t 2,478 t 11,265 t Bulgaria
1970s 19,396 t 3,560 t 15,835 t Bulgaria
1980s 29,115 t 4,052 t 25,063 t Bulgaria
1990s 20,389 t 4,929 t 15,460 t Bulgaria
2000s 6,608 t 5,080 t 1,528 t Bulgaria
2010s 4,421 t 3,986 t 435.59 t Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, Bulgaria or Namibia?
Bulgaria, at 4,027 t against 4,021 t in Namibia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production between Bulgaria and Namibia?
6 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Namibia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Bulgaria and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production?
Bulgaria ranks 146th and Namibia ranks 147th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/bulgaria/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production/bulgaria/namibia/">Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.