Sudan vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Uruguay
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan rank
12th
Uruguay rank
11th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Sudan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sudan ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Sudan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Sudan and Uruguay?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Sudan ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.