Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sweden
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Papua New Guinea rank
144th
Sweden rank
141st
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 144th and Sweden ranks 141st of 166 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Papua New Guinea or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 144th and Sweden ranks 141st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.