North Macedonia vs Saint Lucia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

North Macedonia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Lucia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
132nd
Saint Lucia rank
134th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Saint Lucia
00000198020022024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 132nd and Saint Lucia ranks 134th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, North Macedonia or Saint Lucia?
North Macedonia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between North Macedonia and Saint Lucia?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Saint Lucia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do North Macedonia and Saint Lucia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
North Macedonia ranks 132nd and Saint Lucia ranks 134th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Saint Lucia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/st-lucia/">North Macedonia vs Saint Lucia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.