New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

New Zealand
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Zealand rank
26th
Turkmenistan rank
23rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • New Zealand
  • Turkmenistan
0000196119922024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 23rd of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Turkmenistan
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Turkmenistan
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, New Zealand or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Turkmenistan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
New Zealand ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 23rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/new-zealand/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/new-zealand/turkmenistan/">New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.