How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zimbabwe?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Nepal

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Zimbabwe

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal rank

6th

Zimbabwe rank

4th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Nepal
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 166 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nepal	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1970s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1980s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Nepal or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Nepal and Zimbabwe?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zimbabwe?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Nepal and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Nepal ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/zimbabwe/">Nepal vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.