How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Nepal

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Zambia

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal rank

6th

Zambia rank

8th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Nepal
Zambia

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 8th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nepal	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1970s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1980s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Nepal or Zambia?: Nepal, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 1990.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Nepal and Zambia?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Nepal and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Nepal ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 8th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/zambia/">Nepal vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.